Healthcare professionals
Colorectal lesions
Managing recurrence
Recurrence is common after colorectal EMR
- 15 to 25% within the year following the EMR (1)
Current situation
Follow-up endoscopy is intended to catch recurrence, but
- an endoscopic view enough is not alone
- patients can be discharged with incomplete treatment
- patients can undergo over-treatment
- 15 to 25% within the year following the EMR (1)
Current situation
Follow-up endoscopy is intended to catch recurrence, but
- an endoscopic view enough is not alone
- patients can be discharged with incomplete treatment
- patients can undergo over-treatment
Cellvizio Advantage : Manage Recurrence at Follow up (1-3)
- In vivo characterization at the resection site
- Reliable detection of neoplasia
- Confidence that treatment is complete
- Short learning curve and strong inter-observer agreement
Additional ressources
- Frequent and high-quality training opportunities
- A strong community of KOLs dedicated to the development of pCLE through the International Conference of Cellvizio Users
- Cellvizio.net: a complete e-learning center for Cellvizio users
- We can help you bring Cellvizio to your institution
- Frequently asked questions
Références
1.Shahid et al., Diagnostic Accuracy of probe based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) in Detecting Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplasia After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. ICCU 2011, Accepted for publication in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
2.Buchner AM et al., The learning curve of in vivo probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for prediction of colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011.
3.Gomez V et al., Interobserver agreement and accuracy among international experts with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in predicting colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 2010.
